garden/Liberationist manifesto/Liberationist leadership.md
2025-01-11 19:33:12 -06:00

39 lines
2.8 KiB
Markdown
Raw Permalink Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

Movements, especially ones organizing for liberation, are not leaderless. They are leaderful.
In an interview with IBW21, Patrisse Cullors used the term leaderful to describe the Black Lives Matter movement, which she had co-founded alongside fellow activists and friends Alicia Garza and Opal Tometi. Cullors said that “all movements have many leaders, our movement doesn't believe in a single charismatic leader.”
Revolutionary leadership & critical consciousness (Freire)
The shape of liberation - many connected circles → The Millionth Circle - Black Elk poem, non-hierarchical, aimed at building power and empowering, a web or a network not a pyramid. No top or bottom → equal distribution of power around a center.
The work is spiritual and sacred
“The medium is the message”
+ dual power
+ prefigurative politics
Leaderful because choosing liberation also means accepting responsibility in creating it - “love is as love does”
We dont rely on single charismatic individuals in structuring our movement → collective leadership
+ We also strive to prefer construction over deference
+ “group-centered leadership” (Ella Baker)
+ Focus is on building power and sharing it
+ Strategic, radical, and with global scope
Within our organizing we continue radical traditions while critically examining them and making new ones - everything we do, we should do with a critical understanding of its meaning, intention, and impact
We have to acknowledge power - power exists even when it isnt formally defined → understand the risks of abuse and lack of representation and avoid “tyranny of structurelessness” (Freeman 1973)
+ Democratic delegation
+ Distributing power to as many people as possible
+ Rotating tasks and responsibilities
+ Equal access to resources and knowledge/info
+ Allocate tasks according to reasonable criteria (e.g., ability, passion, etc.) (ECON, Hughes, Tota, et al.)
+ Clearly define roles
+ Accountability (whom are we accountable to? if were actually building something radical, significant, and positive then there should be accountability to a group/community/society)
+ Clarity as form of kindness while also not being too rigid/strict about control
Collective power → communal power → power is shared, it is not property owned by a single person or entity but belongs to everyone and everyone has a responsibility for stewardship
+ We borrow from communal power and work together to tap into it to realize change
+ We need power to be able to rise up against unjust hierarchies and counteract the work of violent institutions, corporations, governments
+ Resistance to the atomization of individuals, erosion of communities, fragmentation of society
+ Promotion of empowered individuals, organized communities, and communities of solidarity (ECON)